| Weitere Links |
NIPCC |
Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (Internationale Nichtregierungskommission zum Klimawandel) founded 2003 |
|---|
NIPCC Report on Global Warming
APS American Physical Society | Organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists |
|---|
APS is reviewing its statements on climate change
FPS Forum on Physics & Society | Division of the American Physical Society |
|---|
The objective of the Forum shall be the advancement and diffusion of knowledge regarding the inter-relation of physics, physicists, and society. The Forum shall provide for all members of the Society an opportunity for discussion and involvement with such matters.
The views expressed in such studies shall be, however, the views of the participants of the study, and are not endorsed by either the Forum or the Society.
Forum on Physics & Society en FPS Home
Debate on Climate change
With this issue of Physics & Society, we kick off a debate concerning one of the main conclusions of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN body which, together with Al Gore, recently won the Nobel Prize for its work concerning climate change research.
There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for the global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.
Forum on Physics & Society en Editor's Comments
Anouncements 2008-07-16
"The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science."
The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming "incontrovertible." (de unbestreitbar, fr incontestable)
Dailytech
Updates 2008-07-17
"The following article has not undergone any scientific peer review. Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article's conclusions."
APS American Physical Society en Christopher Monckton of Brenchley: Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered
APS Position Remains Unchanged
"Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate."
An article at odds with this statement recently appeared in an online newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society, one of 39 units of APS. The header of this newsletter carries the statement that "Opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the APS or of the Forum." This newsletter is not a journal of the APS and it is not peer reviewed.
Replies and comments
Watts Up With That? (Antony Watts)
Dr. Benny Peiser de Ein Brief an die American Physical Society
The letter to President Arthur Bienenstock includes all the reviewer comments and Monckton's responses.
SPPI Science & Public Policy Institute
American physicists warned not to debate global warming
Bureaucrats at the American Physical Society (APS) have issued a curious warning to their members about an article in one of their own publications.
Don't read this, they say - we don't agree with it.
But what is it about the piece that is so terrible, that like Medusa, it could make men go blind?
CFP Canada Free Press
2008-07-21 en
American physicists warned not to debate global warming
Weitere Websites
Wie angekündigt, sind in der Juli-Ausgabe des Journals Physics & Society kritische Artikel erschienen, welche in Widerspruch mit dem offiziellen STatement der APS steht.
Ökologismus de Der Anfang vom Ende eines propagierten Konsenses
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Who is who der Klimaskeptiker | Who is who of the sceptics | Who is who des scepticts |
| Christopher Walter Monckton | Lord, Third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley Journalist, Science advisor to Britain's Thatcher administration, British politician and business consultant, policy advisor, writer, and inventor. (Journaliste scientifique et ancien conseiller de Margaret Thatcher) |
Heartland Institute |
|---|
Mission
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Manifeste und Petitionen | Manifestos and petitions | Manifestations et pétitions |
| Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change | ||
| 500 Scientists Whose Research Contradicts Man-Made Global Warming Scares | ||
OISM Oregon Institute of Science & Medicine |
|---|
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Manifeste und Petitionen | Manifestos and petitions | Manifestations et pétitions |
| Global Warming Petition Project | ||
EIKE Europäisches Institut für Klima und Enegie |
|---|
Zweck des Vereins
Polnische Akademie der Wissenschaften |
|---|
| USA |
Inhofe Rohrabacher Steve Fielding |
| CZ | Klaus |
| FR | Allègre |
| GB |
Wilson Monckton |
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Manifeste, Petitionen, Koalitionen | Manifestos, Petitions, Coalitions | Manifestations, pétitions, coalitions |
| Institute und Organisationen | Institutes and Orgnizations | Instituts et organisations |
US-Repräsentantenhaus
James (Jim) M. Inhofe |
US Senator - Oklahoma Member of the Republican Party, among the most vocal global warming skeptics in Congress |
|---|
Dana Rohrabacher | Representing California's 46th Congressional District |
|---|
Dr. William Gray and Bill Clinton with Al Gore as Vice President
"I had NOAA money for 30 years, and then when the Clinton administration came in and Gore started directing some of the environmental stuff, I was cut off. I couldn't get any money from NOAA. They turned down 13 straight proposals from me."
This man is one of the most prominent hurricane experts in the world, cut off during the Clinton-Gore administration because he had been skeptical of global warming.
William Harper and Bill Clinton with Al Gore as Vice President
Well, that's because William Harper had uttered words indicating that he was open minded to the issue of global warming. So off with his head.
They didn't want someone who was open minded. They wanted someone who was going to provide grants based on people who would verify this man-made global warming theory. Now, that was 1993 when Mr. Harper was relieved, the first year of the Clinton-Gore administration.
So for over a decade, all we got was a drumbeat of one-sided research, setting the stage for the false claim that there is a scientific consensus about whether or not man-made global warming is real.
Labelling as Stalinist
There was a study on research and the environment, a subcommittee of the Science Committee. And I insisted when I was chairman of the committee that expert witnesses on both sides be present at hearings and that they address each other's contentions. Well, to him, that is Stalinism.
Well, I would suggest that the propaganda campaign of the manmade global warming alarmists has far more in common with Stalinism than does insisting that both sides of an argument be heard.
There is a big problem
Contrary to what all those scientists living on their Federal research grants predicted, the world hasn't been getting warmer.
In fact, for the last 7 years, there has been no warming at all, which has been verified even by, for example, Michel Jarraud of the World Meteorological Organization. He's their Secretary General.
He reluctantly admitted that global temperatures have not risen since 1998, according to a BBC article.
Global snowfall is at record levels and there are fewer, not more, hurricanes.
Conclusions
We have not focused on real alternatives to energy like nuclear energy. The fact is that we need to make sure right now that we do our very best not to be captured by this, what I consider to be one of the greatest hoaxes that I have seen in my lifetime, but instead focus our efforts on accomplishing something that is real and positive for the people of the world and the people of the United States of America.
We should be drilling for oil so that the terrorists overseas are denied the revenue when we are forced to buy oil from countries that are allied with these terrorists.
We need to make sure that we develop better engines, and make sure that those engines are not putting pollutants into the air and forget about the CO2, go to the pollutants.
Steve Fielding | Australian, US Senator, Leader of Family First |
|---|
Václav Klaus |
Tschechischer Präsident President of the Czech Republic Le président tchèque |
|---|
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Politische und wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen | Political and econimical impacts | Impacts politiques et économiques |
| Kein Besuch von Freunden | No visite of friends | Ce ne sont pas des amis en visite |
| Notes for the speech of the President of the Czech Republic at the UN Climate Change Conference | ||
FDP/EIKE |
FDP Freie Demokratische Partei EIKE Europäisches Institut für Klima und Energie |
|---|
Diskussionen in Frankreich/French discussions/discussions en France
The Urban Renaissance Institute
TF1
2009-09-27 fr
Climat - Pour Allègre, "Nicolas Hulot est un imbécile"
Claude Allègre affirme, dans une interview publiée dimanche dans le quotidien Nice-Matin, que Nicolas Hulot est "un imbécile" et les théories sur le changement climatique "une vaste plaisanterie".
"Nicolas Hulot est un imbécile, vous pouvez l'écrire.
C'est une honte qu'il soit devenu le gourou de l'écologie.
Il envoie les gens rouler à vélo et lui fait ses affaires en hélicoptère", dit l'ancien ministre de l'Education.
Interrogé sur la taxe carbone, celui qui fut un temps annoncé au gouvernement au printemps et finalement pas nommé, la qualifie de "gadget injuste et inutile": "la France est la seule à l'instaurer.
Aujourd'hui 100 euros, 1.000 euros dans quelques années.
Vous savez, l'essence chère, les familles connaissent déjà".
L'ancien ministre de Lionel Jospin raille aussi, comme il l'a déjà fait, les théories sur le réchauffement climatique, qualifiées de "vaste plaisanterie" dont les promoteurs apportent "des réponses simplistes à un système complexe et prétendent prédire le climat dans cent ans, alors qu'on a du mal à obtenir une météo fiable à plus de trois jours".
"Eux-mêmes ne croient pas ce qu'ils racontent, ajoute Claude Allègre, mais c'est une aubaine pour eux comme, par exemple, récolter des financements publics".
Sammy Wilson |
Minister for the Environment Umweltminister Nordirland |
|---|
EIKE Europäisches Institut für Klima und Energie Jena
Writing exclusively in today's News Letter, the DUP MP controversially slams what he describes as the "hysterical pseudo-religion" of climate change, and calls for a reasoned debate on whether the activities of mankind have triggered current weather trends.
News Letter
⇒ Google Web
en
lord monckton
EIKE Europäisches Institut für Klima und Energie
2010-07-27 de
Die Abraham-Monckton Attacke: Lord Monckton dreht den Spieß um!
Für regelmäßige Leser dieses Blogs ist Lord Christoper Monckton so etwas wie ein alter Bekannter.
Kaum eine Persöhnlichkeit in den Reihen der Kritiker an der Wissenschaft und Politik, welche den menschengemachten Klimawandel als größtes Problem unserer Zeit zu etablieren versucht, ist in der Lage seine Argumente ähnlich überzeugend, elegant und eloquent auf den Punkt zu bringen.
Einige Leser haben Lord Monckton live im letzten Dezember in Berlin auf der Klimakonferenz "Update zur Klimaforschung" erleben dürfen (wir berichteten).
Ein besonderes "Highlight" dieser Veranstaltung war damals die Gegendemonstration, unter anderem organisiert von Greenpeace und der ÖDP.
Dort hat der der eine oder andere Teilnehmer einsehen musste, dass eine starke Überzeugung, auch wenn diese mit Inbrunst vorgetragen wird, wohl doch nicht die gründliche Auseinandersetzung mit den Fakten ersetzen kann. Andernfalls kann man sich nämlich schnell in einer Diskussion als der unterlegene Gesprächspartner erweisen.
Mean global surface temperature anomalies (°C), 2001-2008
Wesentliche Gründe, warum die Schätzungen des IPCC überbewertet sein dürften und daher nicht verläßlich sind, werden erklärt. Noch wichtiger ist die Feststellung, dass es womöglich gar keine "Klimakrise" gibt, und dass die zurzeit so populären Anstrengungen der Regierungen, die anthropogen CO2-Emissionen zu reduzieren, sinnlos sind, kaum berechenbar sind und sogar schädlich sein können. Lord Monckton's neue Studie belegt:
Ökologismus
The present analysis suggests that the failure of the IPCC's models to predict this and many other climatic phenomena arises from defects in its evaluation of the three factors whose product is climate sensitivity.
On this brief analysis, it seems that no great reliance can be placed upon the IPCC's central estimates of climate sensitivity, still less on its high-end estimates. The IPCC's assessments, in their current state, cannot be said to be "policy-relevant". They provide no justification for taking the very costly and drastic actions advocated in some circles to mitigate "global warming", which will be small (<1 °C at CO2 doubling), harmless, and beneficial.
Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Informationen Skepitsche Institute und Organisationen |
Information Sceptical Institutes and Orgnizations |
Informations Instituts et organisations sceptiques |
| APS | American Physical Society |
Abdusamatov Akasofu Allegre Alvensleben Auer Ball Beck Bellamy Botkin Bryson Calder Carter Christy Coleman Compagnucci Courtillot Cunningham Daly Dietze Dittrich Domingos Douglas Douglass Dyson Evans Friis-Christensen Gärtner Gerlich B. Gray V. Gray Griffin Hayden Herman Inhofe C.D and K.E. Idso Izrael Jaworowski Khandekar Klaus Labohm Landscheidt Landsea Leroux Linden Lindzen Loehle Lomborg Lüdecke Malberg McIntyre Martin Ferenc Miskolczi Mörner Monckton Patterson Pekarek Puls Reichert Reiter Rohrabacher Scafetta Segalstad Seitz Shaviv Singer Siitam Sorokhtin Spencer Svensmark M. Taylor Tennekes Thieme Thüne Tscheuschner Watts Wilson Zichichi
de
Meist Kritiker und nicht nur Skeptiker der Thesen der "Klima-Macher"
en
Mostly Critics and not only skeptics of the assumptions of the
"Climate Makers"
fr
Plutôt critiques et pas seulement sceptiques sur les hypothèses
des "faiseurs du climat"
Eigil Friis-Christensen |
Director of the Danish National Space Center, Cand. Mag. (Ph.D.) in Geophysics from University of Copenhagen, Geophysicist at the Danish Meteorological Institute, Expert in space physics. |
|---|
en The sun is at the origin of climate change
⇒ Video: Das Wolken-Mysterium/The cloud mystery/Le mystère des nuages
de Aussagen:
Die beobachteten Erwärmungsmuster, durch den Vergleich der Temperatur am Boden und in der Atmosphäre, zeigen nicht die typischen Merkmale eines Treibhauseffekts. Man kann nicht die Tatsache leugnen, der Einfluss des Menschen ist nicht entscheidend und die Zunahme des CO2 ist ein vernachlässigbarer Faktor bei der Klimaerwärmung.
lycos.de de Stellungnahme von Dr. John Christy vom 13. Mai 2003 gegenüber dem Ressourcenausschuss des US-Repräsentantenhauses
en Statements:
As an aside, it is clear that other emissions may be called pollutants, e.g. sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides and mercury. Controlling these is a completely separate issue from controlling emissions of CO2 and so will not be discussed here.
The conclusion in IPCC 2001 that human induced global warming was clearly evident was partly based on a depiction of the Northern Hemisphere temperature since 1000 A.D. This depiction showed little change until about 1850, then contains a sharp upward rise, suggesting that recent warming was dramatic and linked to human effects.
Since IPCC 2001, two important papers have shown something else.
These studies suggest that the climate we see today is not unusual at all.
John R. Christy : U.S. House Committee on Resources, 13 May 2003
en Statement:
de Aussagen:
fr Déclaration:
de Singer wirkte als leitender Wissenschaftler im US-Verkehrsministerium (1987-89), als deputy assistant administrator for policy im US-Bundesumweltamt (1970-71) und als deputy assistant secretary für Wasserqualität und Forschung im US-Innenministerium (1967-70). Er war Gründungsdekan der School of Environmental and Planetary Sciences (Fakultät für die Wissenschaft der Umwelt und der Planeten) an der Universität von Miami (1964-67), erster Direktor des National Weather Satellite Service (der Nationale Wettersatellitendienst, 1962-64) und als Direktor des Center for Atmospheric and Space Physics (Zentrum für Physik der Atmosphäre und der Raumfahrt) an der Universität Maryland (1953-62).
In den 1980er Jahren war Singer fünf Jahre lang Stellvertretender Vorsitzender des National Advisory Committee for Oceans and Atmosphere (der Nationale Beratungsausschuß für Ozeane und Atmosphäre, NACOA). Er leitet zur Zeit das gemeinnützige Science and Environmental Policy Project, das er 1990 gegründet hat. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf der SEPP-Webpräsenz www.sepp.org.
About F. Singer: (Page 29)
John Lawrence Daly | 1943 - 2004 |
|---|
R. Timothy (Tim) Patterson | PhD, Professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, Canada |
|---|
Theodor Landscheidt |
10.3.1927 - 19.5.2004 Dr, Schroeter Institute for Research in Cycles of Solar Activity, Nova Scotia, Canada |
|---|
Richard S. Lindzen | US-Klimatologe, Massachussets Institute of Technology (MIT), membre de l'Académie des sciences américaine et ex-représentant auprès du GIEC |
|---|
Khabibullo Abdusamatov | Head of the St. Petersburg's Pulkovskaya Astronomical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
|---|
...
I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.
As the IPCC leadership has seen no wrong in Dr. Trenberth's actions and have retained him as a Lead Author for the AR4, I have decided to no longer participate in the IPCC AR4."
Evidence of the politicized atmosphere of the IPCC comes from the resignation of Christopher Landsea.
In January 2005 Christopher Landsea resigned from work on the IPCC AR4, saying that he viewed the process as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.
WEBCommentary/Bob Webster
Christopher Landsea a rédigé une lettre de démission (voir plus haut) destinée aux dirigeants du GIEC qui explique tout cela en détail. Cette lettre restera dans les mémoires même si elle n'a pas fait bouger d'un iota les instances du GIEC, toujours fortes de leurs "certitudes"... même si elles contredisent carrément les résultats de la Science..
Pensée unique fr Christopher Landsea
Wikipedia fr La démission de Christopher Landsea
| de | Internet-Terror : Manipulation von Wikipedia durch einen Administrator. |
|---|---|
| en | At Wikipedia, one man engineers the debate on global warming. |
| fr | A Wikipedia, un homme dirige le débat sur le réchauffement climatique et à sa manière. |
C. D. Idso | Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change |
|---|
K. E. Idso | Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change |
|---|
Paavo Siitam |
|---|
Heinz Thieme | Dipl.-Ing. |
|---|
Ernst-Georg Beck | Dipl. Biologe, Biesheim, Frankreich |
|---|
de
Die CO2-Angaben des IPCC sind falsch!
Das Kyoto-Protokoll basiert auf falschen Angaben!
Beck hat nachgewiesen, dass die CO2-Angaben des IPCC auf denen das Kyoto-Protokoll basiert, nicht richtig sind. Auch die von Al Gore viel gerühmten Eisbohrkerne werden in dieser Beziehung falsch interpretiert.
Damit ist ein weiterer Beweis erbracht, dass das vom Menschen verursachte CO2 keinen Einfluss auf eine Klimaänderung hat (und es daher auch nichts nützt mehr CO2 zu erzeugen, wenn es kälter werden sollte).
Wenn die CO2-Treibhausteorie mit der Gegenstrahlung weiterhin aufrechterhalten wird, muss nach der Meinung von Beck von Betrug gesprochen werden.
en
IPCC does not give correct datas!
The protocol of Kyoto is based on wrong figures!
fr
Les indications du GIEC (IPCC) sont fausses!
Le protocol de Kyoto se base sur des valeurs qui sont fausses!
Ernst-Georg Beck:
Modern greenhouse hypothesis is based on the work of G.S. Callendar and C.D. Keeling, following S. Arrhenius, as latterly popularized by the IPCC.
Review of available literature raise the question if these authors have systematically discarded a large number of valid technical papers and older atmospheric CO2 determinations because they did not fit their hypothesis?
Obviously they use only a few carefully selected values from the older literature, invariably choosing results that are consistent with the hypothesis of an induced rise of CO2 in air caused by the burning of fossil fuel.
"Since 1812, the CO2 concentration in northern hemispheric air has fluctuated exhibiting three high level maxima around 1825, 1857 and 1942 the latter showing more than 400 ppm."
Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski:
The basis of most of the IPCC conclusions on anthropogenic causes and
on projections of climatic change is the assumption of low level of
CO2 in the pre-industrial atmosphere.
This assumption, based on glaciological studies, is false."
Marcel Leroux |
Professeur de climatologie PhD, Professor Emeritus of Climatology, University Jean Moulin of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS |
|---|
Dr. Jean Martin (Pensée Unique):
Le 12 août 2008,
le grand climatologue français, Marcel Leroux, nous a
quitté après une longue et douloureuse maladie. |
|---|
Skyfall/Changement climatique fr
Décès du climatologue Marcel Leroux
Le blog de Francis Richard fr
Mort du climatologue dissident Marcel Leroux
weltwoche.ch
According to the models and the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), it would seem that the greenhouse effect, especially in its anthropic aspect, is responsible for all climatic changes. This is obviously a simplification, a caricature, because other factors are involved, and very much more effectively. These different factors act upon what is generally called the 'climatic system', a practical label but one which does not always imply the totality of the phenomena which need to be taken into account in our understanding of the dynamics of climatic changes.
"The possible causes, then, of climate change are: well-established orbital parameters on the palaeoclimatic scale, ... solar activity, ...; volcanism ...; and far at the rear, the greenhouse effect, and in particular that caused by water vapor, the extent of its influence being unknown. These factors are working together all the time, and it seems difficult to unravel the relative importance of their respective influences upon climatic evolution. Equally, it is tendentious to highlight the anthropic factor, which is, clearly, the least credible among all those previously mentioned."
WEBCommentary/Bob Webster
Dailymotion Video (19:23)
Cette focalisation, par défaut, sur l'effet de serre, est révélatrice de l'état de la discipline climatologique. En dépit de progrès considérables dans l'observation (par le satellite notamment) et dans le traitement (informatique), la discipline est dans une impasse conceptuelle depuis une cinquantaine d'années. Les modèles, en particulier, ne rendent pas compte des mécanismes véritables de la circulation générale, pourtant responsable de la transmission des changements climatiques.
Marcel Leroux
Ce sont les AMP, ou Anticyclones Mobiles Polaires qui véhiculent de l'air froid en direction des Tropiques.
Les périodes de canicule sont toujours associées à une forte hausse de la pression, dont on ne parle pas alors que c'est le facteur essentiel de la chaleur et de la sécheresse.
La circulation générale est en effet entrée dans un mode rapide depuis les années 1970 (M. Leroux, 2005), mode de circulation qui est exactement l'inverse de l'évolution dite "de l'effet de serre" prédite par le GIEC.
Même l'évolution de la pression de surface, paramètre pourtant hautement significatif de l'évolution climatique, est délibérément ignorée, parce que la hausse de pression est antinomique des scénarios du GIEC !
Une telle hausse (de plusieurs hPa à l'échelle des moyennes annuelles, ce qui est considérable) n'a évidemment rien à voir avec le prétendu "réchauffement climatique".
agriculture-environnement.fr
| de | en | fr |
|---|---|---|
| Informationen zum Klimawandel | Information on Climate Change | Informations sur le changement climatique |
| Who is who der Klimaskeptiker | Who is who | Who is who |